In SaaS, support tickets are product feedback with a deadline attached. Raiseaticket separates bugs from how-to questions, shows which release caused the spike, and keeps the trail your engineers need - free for 5 agents and 500 tickets a month.
Tag a ticket as a defect, a how-to or a feature request, so the reporting tells you what to fix and what to document.
Tag by version and the volume trend shows a regression the day it ships, not the week the renewal is at risk.
Different response targets for different customer tiers, so an enterprise account is not queued behind a trial signup.
The same twenty questions follow every signup. Answer them once in the knowledge base and stop answering them by hand.
Ticket volume by tag is the least arguable input a product meeting can have - it is what users actually hit, not what they said in a survey.
Private notes keep the engineering discussion off the customer-facing thread while the ticket stays one conversation.

A defect and a how-to arrive in the same inbox and get the same treatment. Tagging separates them before either is missed.
Five people report the same thing in a week and it reads as five tickets. Tagged volume makes the pattern obvious.
Without per-priority targets, the loudest customer wins rather than the one you promised a response time to.
Requests answered politely and then forgotten. Tag them and the roadmap conversation starts with numbers.
Split defects, how-to and feature requests, then report on the split.
View details
Point your existing support address at the helpdesk. Customers notice nothing.
Bug, how-to, feature request. Three is enough to start - more can wait.
One SLA for paying customers, one for trials. Refine once you see real numbers.
Take volume by tag into the product meeting instead of anecdotes.
Yes. SLA policies set response and resolution targets per priority, counted in your operating hours, so an enterprise account is not sitting behind a trial signup. This is on the free plan, not an upgrade.
Tag them differently. Reporting then shows volume by tag over time, which is what turns five separate complaints into one visible regression - and what tells you which questions belong in the knowledge base rather than in a reply.
There is a REST API as a Premium add-on for pushing tickets into your own systems. Out of the box, most teams tag the ticket and reference the issue ID in a private note, which keeps the customer thread readable while engineering works in its own tool.
Multi-factor authentication is free, agent privileges control who sees which queues, every ticket carries an audit trail, and data is hosted in EU-based data centres. The security page covers what procurement usually asks.
It depends far more on your onboarding quality than your user count - a good knowledge base deflects the repeat questions that make up most early volume. If you do pass it, you add an agent pack from your workspace and nothing stops working meanwhile.
Yes. Departments keep customer queues separate from internal ones, and internal ticketing handles engineering, IT and HR requests in the same place without exposing them to customers.
Free forever for 5 agents. No credit card, no trial clock and nothing to install.
Free foreverNo credit cardNot a 6-month trial